Information on Result #473721

There is no (158, 216, 1996)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 105688 081924 452608 622010 703849 797165 595875 039024 536817 587536 241936 > 2216

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (158, 217, 1996)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction