Information on Result #473721
There is no (158, 216, 1996)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 105688 081924 452608 622010 703849 797165 595875 039024 536817 587536 241936 > 2216
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (158, 217, 1996)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction |