Information on Result #473782

There is no (145, 217, 880)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 214158 591695 278324 309394 270357 693151 750205 180296 951616 670153 203863 > 2217

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (145, 218, 880)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction