Information on Result #473895

There is no (95, 219, 197)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 967999 421420 330752 008082 005972 932650 776626 307867 147206 278763 267584 > 2219

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (95, 220, 197)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction