Information on Result #473912
There is no (129, 219, 451)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 842970 313907 035204 694692 812468 098278 719299 898909 839862 248310 520320 > 2219
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (129, 220, 451)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |