Information on Result #473920

There is no (145, 219, 834)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 877652 522922 172273 104411 830351 651974 076049 107045 111835 113829 180560 > 2219

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (145, 220, 834)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction