Information on Result #473965
There is no (96, 220, 200)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 933571 072076 994526 960371 129194 397115 458347 549057 354924 813099 414088 > 2220
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (96, 221, 200)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |