Information on Result #473983

There is no (132, 220, 491)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 824066 441442 010372 228916 119896 679993 579793 178492 567871 846986 004248 > 2220

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (132, 221, 491)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction