Information on Result #473998

There is no (162, 220, 2201)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 702271 790979 241031 318738 413381 802956 169345 938213 037144 232475 449120 > 2220

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (162, 221, 2201)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction