Information on Result #474029

There is no (85, 221, 163)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3 425861 073854 504985 661430 469423 396476 639149 964328 115044 753191 687872 > 2221

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (85, 222, 163)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction