Information on Result #474030
There is no (87, 221, 169)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3 722344 269217 457995 033064 495293 475531 319684 123123 627530 552870 163856 > 2221
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (87, 222, 169)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |