Information on Result #474031
There is no (89, 221, 175)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3 693912 222169 356181 752637 149859 117606 374896 492786 022978 513556 174638 > 2221
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (89, 222, 175)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |