Information on Result #474034
There is no (95, 221, 195)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3 476528 635738 748402 067321 193557 765489 089479 011769 851691 366204 583392 > 2221
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (95, 222, 195)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |