Information on Result #474051

There is no (129, 221, 439)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3 569419 174161 464475 563621 566648 158009 573865 246605 532382 392041 570990 > 2221

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (129, 222, 439)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction