Information on Result #474066

There is no (159, 221, 1693)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3 388536 554740 139795 367046 355095 764818 320280 890723 646775 090060 164920 > 2221

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (159, 222, 1693)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction