Information on Result #474101

There is no (88, 222, 172)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 8 507677 266597 176487 755919 289250 500516 160841 913945 545631 474204 913814 > 2222

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (88, 223, 172)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction