Information on Result #474247
There is no (100, 224, 212)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 28 433175 983912 031135 567736 375866 093345 693972 959114 562833 679706 521296 > 2224
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (100, 225, 212)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |