Information on Result #474316

There is no (95, 225, 193)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 68 093677 458164 984503 959903 758462 805068 579436 380081 684607 759598 784734 > 2225

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (95, 226, 193)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction