Information on Result #474317

There is no (97, 225, 200)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 64 615804 084397 594935 869781 260614 034490 322093 198658 055663 420302 496863 > 2225

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (97, 226, 200)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction