Information on Result #474339

There is no (141, 225, 617)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 54 531914 749531 509427 972036 586895 042923 372202 525330 195322 963770 317004 > 2225

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (141, 226, 617)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction