Information on Result #474407

There is no (136, 226, 510)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 115 004942 296175 583258 500230 330031 316685 033495 456053 036583 970048 943701 > 2226

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (136, 227, 510)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction