Information on Result #474459

There is no (95, 227, 191)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 229 528865 379771 864286 763671 018508 204192 041578 714043 221408 654509 870198 > 2227

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (95, 228, 191)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction