Information on Result #474461

There is no (99, 227, 206)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 260 457488 698396 597155 878714 151251 440135 853375 918610 019492 179045 920967 > 2227

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (99, 228, 206)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction