Information on Result #474462

There is no (101, 227, 214)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 265 760189 194021 902210 134128 299653 399455 917611 101643 943115 969315 666496 > 2227

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (101, 228, 214)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction