Information on Result #474479
There is no (135, 227, 486)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 222 292956 271858 142667 670917 463335 512713 299424 755646 887701 642237 894368 > 2227
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (135, 228, 486)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |