Information on Result #474493

There is no (163, 227, 1701)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 219 027438 038030 287324 367472 869897 691834 237101 000060 159350 358961 208885 > 2227

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (163, 228, 1701)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction