Information on Result #474533
There is no (100, 228, 209)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 516 705603 141219 588234 318348 029611 300665 757531 967034 960851 079319 213539 > 2228
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (100, 229, 209)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |