Information on Result #474551

There is no (136, 228, 494)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 433 243943 278033 880354 001956 118976 312357 579881 609742 768637 203762 722120 > 2228

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (136, 229, 494)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction