Information on Result #474564

There is no (162, 228, 1534)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 434 506691 640692 579206 076656 895388 275764 916625 979116 207419 518221 353567 > 2228

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (162, 229, 1534)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction