Information on Result #474671
There is no (88, 230, 168)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1758 187785 693883 409648 640513 269716 612434 272283 543489 675456 283137 614014 > 2230
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (88, 231, 168)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |