Information on Result #474707

There is no (160, 230, 1272)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1743 100945 880344 813607 637169 741491 641499 180018 138220 755949 625628 032617 > 2230

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (160, 231, 1272)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction