Information on Result #474741

There is no (85, 231, 160)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3729 103493 532142 862175 060673 020408 986550 255191 820293 722225 688209 880054 > 2231

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (85, 232, 160)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction