Information on Result #474925

There is no (163, 233, 1353)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 13966 311938 615450 154637 977826 569395 004090 122112 129278 883271 960760 480944 > 2233

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (163, 234, 1353)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction