Information on Result #474997

There is no (160, 234, 1121)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 28223 590804 438389 127408 956347 918664 891016 276733 720997 052095 897206 516544 > 2234

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (160, 235, 1121)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction