Information on Result #475184

There is no (91, 237, 174)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 244363 864118 503587 833152 704042 899386 685621 611229 428721 995212 279123 716714 > 2237

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (91, 238, 174)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction