Information on Result #475220

There is no (163, 237, 1189)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 226750 760714 600821 267945 780409 493641 429053 524509 253153 346467 944653 378018 > 2237

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (163, 238, 1189)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction