Information on Result #475265
There is no (104, 238, 216)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 512687 826878 414489 832953 067856 007866 241061 844107 855332 757428 632890 390863 > 2238
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (104, 239, 216)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |