Information on Result #475293

There is no (160, 238, 1002)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 451589 026056 591812 975659 404074 003724 094786 118415 536565 021187 390668 532284 > 2238

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (160, 239, 1002)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction