Information on Result #475447

There is no (168, 240, 1399)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 803477 743142 579656 062584 811674 739355 900148 187397 523096 016097 259105 187355 > 2240

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (168, 241, 1399)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction