Information on Result #475749

There is no (160, 244, 866)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 29 009203 333569 643081 225415 162371 245373 780392 720107 530695 709018 876421 915552 > 2244

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (160, 245, 866)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction