Information on Result #475793
There is no (91, 245, 172)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 75 434648 015255 919165 394612 874918 294522 654867 853754 689183 890085 192405 776320 > 2245
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (91, 246, 172)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |