Information on Result #475870

There is no (90, 246, 169)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 142 349004 649126 397271 754774 108380 864489 760359 620687 984736 420517 660971 704800 > 2246

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (90, 247, 169)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction