Information on Result #475871
There is no (92, 246, 174)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 138 194491 214185 269944 847048 212441 329140 644481 520615 445526 877637 404870 182910 > 2246
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (92, 247, 174)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |