Information on Result #475905

There is no (160, 246, 829)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 115 621738 564298 391897 958560 763430 593014 015505 116779 512265 604415 225280 106400 > 2246

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (160, 247, 829)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction