Information on Result #476141

There is no (165, 249, 945)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 906 624983 347784 698852 033251 958017 408789 358570 525835 442054 196948 220848 967232 > 2249

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (165, 250, 945)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction