Information on Result #476376
There is no (164, 252, 851)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 7345 978706 512210 816992 086433 530150 942901 230644 721032 905307 358367 317118 303768 > 2252
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (164, 253, 851)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |