Information on Result #476421

There is no (95, 253, 180)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 19494 576229 601300 295540 488950 072505 031821 761976 767109 501982 504189 683826 345608 > 2253

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (95, 254, 180)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction