Information on Result #476505
There is no (106, 254, 212)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 35613 712128 496597 971315 562473 024824 083124 625318 025310 971901 630680 702624 027918 > 2254
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (106, 255, 212)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |