Information on Result #476579
There is no (93, 255, 174)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 70395 655901 892380 231903 045400 129160 137923 466194 532391 325830 057047 884146 431700 > 2255
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (93, 256, 174)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |