Information on Result #476580

There is no (95, 255, 179)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 69368 926555 450777 355184 074285 086437 322368 973570 508874 632802 158092 010173 244806 > 2255

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (95, 256, 179)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction