Information on Result #476740
There is no (95, 257, 178)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 243601 248746 464094 219146 549313 861120 597382 371608 532002 754188 467477 185144 335714 > 2257
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (95, 258, 178)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |